1.0ProActive Legalhttps://proactivelegal.com.au/cn/pal_adminhttps://proactivelegal.com.au/cn/author/pal_admin/「投资移民上诉案例分享」 - 未满足生意实际运营要求 - ProActive Legalrich600338<blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="gSu7Ul8CKg"><a href="https://proactivelegal.com.au/cn/cases/c116/">「投资移民上诉案例分享」 – 未满足生意实际运营要求</a></blockquote><iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://proactivelegal.com.au/cn/cases/c116/embed/#?secret=gSu7Ul8CKg" width="600" height="338" title="“「投资移民上诉案例分享」 – 未满足生意实际运营要求” — ProActive Legal" data-secret="gSu7Ul8CKg" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"></iframe><script type="text/javascript">
/* <![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&"undefined"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
//# sourceURL=https://proactivelegal.com.au/wp-includes/js/wp-embed.min.js
/* ]]> */
</script>
https://proactivelegal.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/5-2.jpg19801080签证官认为Gina（化名）的生意不满足两年的经营要求，因此拒绝了Gina的892投资移民永居签证申请。我们帮助Gina申请AAT优先审理，重新准备了申请材料，并且针对拒签原因进行了解释，成功获得了胜利的裁决，帮助其顺利拿到澳大利亚绿卡。